"Affordable million." Feedback about the project

The topic of additional earnings on the Internet today is especially relevant for older people and young professionals who do not have an experience of offline work.

Many of them, wishing to earn more,agree to carry out any work: attract people to non-existent projects, leave deliberately false reviews ... "Affordable million" - one of those projects, the view of which is difficult to draw up because of conflicting recommendations. It happens when someone is telling the truth, but someone ...

Meanwhile, an increasing number of users who have read false comments, report on the negative experience that they had to endure.

What promises the project "Affordable million." Credits for the system "Sigma"

The name of the project speaks for itself: with its help, anyone who wants, regardless of age and education, can, by performing a number of simple operations, significantly improve their financial situation.

People who call themselves curators attractusers of the Global Network, offering them a million. Of course, curators specify, the system does not give away millions just like that. They have to earn. Those who hear about the project for the first time, are invited to visit a forum where you can communicate with those who already earn, and read reviews. "Affordable million" here is presented as a solid project, having registered on which, everyone can "rise".

The Sigma program is, without a doubt,a unique product. Anyway, that's what even users who are negative about such kinds of "earnings" believe, and who argue that selling binary options without having adequate training is a deliberately failed event.

I must say that even loyalspecialists devoted the most enthusiastic reviews to the program "Sigma". "Affordable million", unfortunately, was not honored with such praise. If "Sigma" is called the fruit of an ingenious developer, then the "Affordable million" system is a fraudulent site.

Meanwhile, the curators explain the latterrecruits that "Sigma" is not for sale, but free of charge given to traders for work. But before the beginning "trader" will be allowed to work, the leadership of "Affordable million" needs to consider and approve his candidacy.

How to make a million

After registration on the project "Available million"beginning traders get access to the Sigma PRO program (some recruiters call this program "Sigma 20122"), designed to work with binary options.

"Cooperation" ends right afterhow a newly made "trader" credits the site with the required amount. Money immediately disappears from the account, and the perplexed "binary options dealer" is informed that no one is insured against losing.

What you should know about the "Affordable million" program. Reviews of negatively-minded users

The authors of this project offer usersGlobal network to open trading accounts in order to increase their deposits through an intermediary, the working title of which is "Affordable million." The main activity of the project is the trade in binary options.

Users of the Global Network who are authorsnegative feedback on the "Affordable million" program, call the "Sigma" system a unique algorithm that has fallen into the hands of scammers. The activity of managers inviting inexperienced citizens to the position of traders, opponents of this type of earnings called a cheating scheme.

"Sigma": the opinion of specialists

The program "Sigma", as the authors of the project"Affordable million", was developed by the staff of the Novosibirsk Research Institute of Technology in 2012, with a western bank acting as the customer.

Subsequently, developers whose headis a certain Nikolay Potanin, found the opportunity not to pay the fruits of his work in private hands, and today the true version of "Sigma" exists only on the website "Affordable million."

Skeptical specialists checked thisinformation and came to the conclusion that neither the research institute nor the development team really exists, and the "Affordable million" project is a fraudulent site.

How do "barkers" work?

People seeking new candidates,spread on the sites or forums visited about the following: "... I searched the internet for a long time and without success, and suddenly came across a site advertising the" Sigma "program ... which generates callsigns that simplify the binary options trading ...". Then follows about such an enthusiastic response: "Available million" - a working project, thanks to which the invested amount has increased by one and a half (or even more) times in just two hours of online work. "

In the event that the first advertising post is leftwithout an answer, after him the same day, only a few hours later, another is being written - no less iridescent, in which the lucky owner of a well-paid remote work wants to share his joy with those who are not earning.

In a few words "shy" tellsa standard story about the first doubts, the days spent on "digesting" the supporting information and acquaintance with the reviews of those who believed in the possibility of easy earning and not lost.

The culmination of the story is eitheran impressive screenshot, or a written revelation about how we weighed all the pros and cons, once again read through the reviews of the "Affordable million" project, left by other "employees", and then finally decided to take a chance.

At the end of the post, "barker" reports that only a few minutes (or hours) back found that his account received the coveted amount.

Work with objections

Anyone, even an experienced recruiter, has the right toan error. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies (concerning, for example, the timing of the withdrawal of earnings), which are often found in the posts of newcomers, quickly become the property of "opposition".

If the objections of skeptics, who doubt,that the system "Affordable million" (reviews about this project are quite contradictory) are really so good, backed up by undeniable arguments, one or more (depending on the situation) users - fans of the discussed methodology of earnings - appear on the forum. They are usually more experienced and better prepared. Their goal - using suggestive questions and expressing their assumptions, to help the scandalous "colleague" get out of the difficult situation.

</ p>